Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 601

Legal Malpractice—Causation

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

To recover damages from [name of defendant], [name of plaintiff] must

prove that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it] would have obtained a better

result if [name of defendant] had acted as a reasonably careful attorney.

[Name of plaintiff] was not harmed by [name of defendant]’s conduct if the

same harm would have occurred anyway without that conduct.

New September 2003; Revised June 2015, May 2020, December 2022

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
df0c291068484dd45a9bc4a66e8fa0956d2670e356bede8c498f5d3a484a6e3c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CACI No. 601 — Legal Malpractice—Causation · binding.law