Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 472

Primary Assumption of Risk—Exception to

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Nonliability—Facilities Owners and Operators and Event

Sponsors

[Name of plaintiff] claims [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] was harmed while

[participating in/watching] [sport or other recreational activity, e.g.,

snowboarding] at [name of defendant]’s [specify facility or event where

plaintiff was injured, e.g., ski resort]. To establish this claim, [name of

plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of defendant] was the [owner/operator/sponsor/ other]

of [e.g., a ski resort];

2. [That [name of defendant] unreasonably increased the risks to

[name of plaintiff] over and above those inherent in [e.g.,

snowboarding];]

2. [or]

2. [That [name of defendant] unreasonably failed to minimize a risk

that is not inherent in [e.g., snowboarding] and unreasonably

exposed [name of plaintiff] to an increased risk of harm;]

3. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and

4. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in

causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.

A risk is inherent in a [sport/activity] if eliminating the risk would

discourage vigorous participation or otherwise fundamentally change the

[sport/activity].

A [owner/operator/sponsor/other] of [e.g., a ski resort] has a duty to use

reasonable care not to increase the risks of [e.g., snowboarding] over and

above those inherent in the [sport/activity], and a duty to use reasonable

care to minimize a risk that is not inherent in [e.g., snowboarding] to the

extent possible without changing the nature of the [sport/activity].

New December 2013; Revised and Renumbered from CACI No. 410 May 2017;

Revised May 2019, December 2025

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2026
Content hash
8ec892e68febfb7427a7a9d54347e558694dce08dae4d71a2a7e92aa7e5a57e1
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.