CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 472
Primary Assumption of Risk—Exception to
Nonliability—Facilities Owners and Operators and Event
Sponsors
[Name of plaintiff] claims [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] was harmed while
[participating in/watching] [sport or other recreational activity, e.g.,
snowboarding] at [name of defendant]’s [specify facility or event where
plaintiff was injured, e.g., ski resort]. To establish this claim, [name of
plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1. That [name of defendant] was the [owner/operator/sponsor/ other]
of [e.g., a ski resort];
2. [That [name of defendant] unreasonably increased the risks to
[name of plaintiff] over and above those inherent in [e.g.,
snowboarding];]
2. [or]
2. [That [name of defendant] unreasonably failed to minimize a risk
that is not inherent in [e.g., snowboarding] and unreasonably
exposed [name of plaintiff] to an increased risk of harm;]
3. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
4. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
A risk is inherent in a [sport/activity] if eliminating the risk would
discourage vigorous participation or otherwise fundamentally change the
[sport/activity].
A [owner/operator/sponsor/other] of [e.g., a ski resort] has a duty to use
reasonable care not to increase the risks of [e.g., snowboarding] over and
above those inherent in the [sport/activity], and a duty to use reasonable
care to minimize a risk that is not inherent in [e.g., snowboarding] to the
extent possible without changing the nature of the [sport/activity].
New December 2013; Revised and Renumbered from CACI No. 410 May 2017;
Revised May 2019, December 2025
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2026
- Content hash
8ec892e68febfb7427a7a9d54347e558694dce08dae4d71a2a7e92aa7e5a57e1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.