Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 4574

Right to Repair Act—Affirmative Defense—Plaintiff’s

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Subsequent Acts or Omissions (Civ. Code, § 945.5(d))

[Name of defendant] claims that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it] is not

responsible for [name of plaintiff]’s harm because it was caused by [name

of plaintiff]’s later [acts/ [or] omissions]. To establish this defense [name of

defendant] must prove that the harm was caused by [[name of plaintiff]’s

later [alterations/ordinary wear and tear/misuse/abuse/[or] neglect]/ [or]

the structure’s use for something other than its intended purpose].

New May 2019; Revised May 2020

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
9e74e6a8238ee33d7af3a2200772c4be8711e40abf67d14ba1e644e3cf770d42
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.