Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 456

Defendant Estopped From Asserting Statute of Limitations

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Defense

[Name of plaintiff] claims that even if [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun/its]

lawsuit was not filed on time, [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it] may still

proceed because [name of defendant] did or said something that caused

[name of plaintiff] to delay filing the lawsuit. In order to establish the

right to proceed, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of defendant] said or did something that caused [name

of plaintiff] to believe that it would not be necessary to file a

lawsuit;

2. That [name of plaintiff] relied on [name of defendant]’s conduct

and therefore did not file the lawsuit within the time otherwise

required;

3. That a reasonable person in [name of plaintiff]’s position would

have relied on [name of defendant]’s conduct; [and]

[4. That after the limitation period had expired, [name of defendant]’s

representations by words or conduct proved to not be true; and]

5. That [name of plaintiff] proceeded diligently to file suit once [he/

she/nonbinary pronoun /it] discovered the need to proceed.

It is not necessary that [name of defendant] have acted in bad faith or

intended to mislead [name of plaintiff].

New October 2008; Revised December 2014, June 2015, May 2020

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
a859c52be1aa2a457f06067b14aec762ef1e5c82e420dafcd387dd55e919926f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.