Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 4502

Breach of Implied Covenant to Provide Necessary Items

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Within Owner’s Control—Essential Factual Elements

In every construction contract, it is understood that the owner will

provide access to the project site and do those things within the owner’s

control that are necessary for the contractor to reasonably and timely

perform its work. [Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant]

breached the contract by [specify what owner failed to do, e.g., failing to

procure a disposal permit for hazardous materials]. To establish this claim,

[name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of plaintiff] could not reasonably or timely perform

[his/her/nonbinary pronoun /its] work without [insert short name for

item, e.g., a disposal permit];

2. That [name of defendant] knew or reasonably should have known

that [e.g., a disposal permit] was necessary for [name of plaintiff] to

reasonably and timely perform the work;

3. That [name of defendant] had the ability to [e.g., procure a disposal

permit];

4. That [name of plaintiff] could not [e.g., obtain a disposal permit]

without [name of defendant]’s assistance;

5. That [name of defendant] failed to [e.g., procure a disposal permit]

in a timely manner; and

6. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed by [name of defendant]’s

failure.

New December 2010; Revised June 2011

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
dc74bb3b1f1267fde0952b5155951d6dd3e55bd0681d21e71381459c426f4f4c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.