CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 4328
Affirmative Defense—Victim of Abuse or Violence (Code Civ.
Proc., § 1161.3)
[Name of defendant] claims that [name of plaintiff] is not entitled to evict
[him/her/nonbinary pronoun] because [name of plaintiff] filed this lawsuit
based on [an] act[s] of [domestic violence/sexual assault/stalking/human
trafficking/ [or] abuse of an elder or dependent adult/ [or] [specify crime
from Civil Code section 1946.7]] against [[name of defendant]/ [or] a
member of [name of defendant]’s immediate family/ [or] a member of
[name of defendant]’s household]. To succeed on this defense, [name of
defendant] must prove all of the following:
1. That [name of plaintiff] received documentation showing that
[[name of defendant]/ [or] a member of [name of defendant]’s
immediate family/ [or] a member of [name of defendant]’s
household] was a victim of [domestic violence/sexual
assault/stalking/human trafficking/ [or] abuse of an elder or
dependent adult/ [or] [specify crime from Civil Code section
1946.7]];
2. That the act[s] of [domestic violence/sexual
assault/stalking/human trafficking/ [or] abuse of an elder or
dependent adult/ [or] [specify crime from Civil Code section
1946.7]] [was/were] documented in a [court order/law
enforcement report/statement of a qualified third party acting in
a professional capacity/[specify other evidence or documentation]];
3. That the person who committed the act[s] of [domestic violence/
sexual assault/stalking/human trafficking/ [or] abuse of an elder
or dependent adult/ [or] [specify crime from Civil Code section
1946.7]] is not a tenant of the same living unit as [[name of
defendant]/ [or] a member of [name of defendant]’s immediate
family/ [or] a member of [name of defendant]’s household]; and
4. That [name of plaintiff] filed this lawsuit seeking to evict [name of
defendant] because of the act[s] of [domestic violence/sexual
assault/stalking/human trafficking/ [or] abuse of an elder or
dependent adult/ [or] [specify crime from Civil Code section
1946.7]].
Even if [name of defendant] proves all of the above, [name of plaintiff]
may still evict [name of defendant] if [name of plaintiff] proves all of the
following:
1. That the person who committed the abuse or violence threatened,
by words or by actions, the physical safety of other [tenants/ [or]
guests/ [or] invitees/ [,/or] licensees];
2. That [name of plaintiff] gave [name of defendant] a three-day notice
requiring [him/her/nonbinary pronoun] not to voluntarily permit or
consent to the presence on the property of the person who
committed the abuse or violence; and
3. That, after the three-day notice expired, [name of defendant]
voluntarily permitted or consented to the presence on the
property of the person who committed the abuse or violence.
[If the person who committed the abuse or violence is also a defendant
in this case, I will decide if an eviction of only that person is appropriate
after you, the jury, decide certain facts.]
New December 2011; Revised June 2013, June 2014, January 2019, May 2020, May
2024, November 2024
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
1d1502f43dd35524210b1577b7616d4ce0d8126999e209e8a0fdeb8161f34c2a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.