Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 4321

Affirmative Defense—Retaliatory Eviction—Tenant’s

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Complaint (Civ. Code, § 1942.5)

[Name of defendant] claims that [name of plaintiff] is not entitled to evict

[him/her/nonbinary pronoun/it] because [name of plaintiff] filed this lawsuit

in retaliation for [name of defendant]’s having exercised [his/her/ nonbinary

pronoun/its] rights as a tenant. To succeed on this defense, [name of

defendant] must prove all of the following:

[1. That [name of defendant] was not in default in the payment of

[his/her/nonbinary pronoun /its] rent;]

2. That [name of plaintiff] filed this lawsuit in retaliation because

[name of defendant] had complained about the condition of the

property to [[name of plaintiff]/[name of appropriate agency]]; and

3. That [name of plaintiff] filed this lawsuit within 180 days after

3. [Select the applicable date(s) or event(s):]

3. [the date on which [name of defendant], in good faith, gave notice

to [name of plaintiff] or made an oral complaint to [name of

plaintiff] regarding the conditions of the property][./; or]

3. [the date on which [name of defendant], in good faith, filed a

written complaint, or an oral complaint that was registered or

otherwise recorded in writing, with [name of appropriate agency],

of which [name of plaintiff] had notice, for the purpose of

obtaining correction of a condition of the property][./; or]

3. [the date of an inspection or a citation, resulting from a

complaint to [name of appropriate agency] of which [name of

plaintiff] did not have notice][./; or]

3. [the filing of appropriate documents to begin a judicial or an

arbitration proceeding involving the conditions of the property][./;

or]

3. [entry of judgment or the signing of an arbitration award that

determined the issue of the conditions of the property against

[name of plaintiff]].

[Even if [name of defendant] has proved that [name of plaintiff] filed this

lawsuit with a retaliatory motive, [name of plaintiff] is still entitled to

possession of the premises if [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it] proves that

[he/she/nonbinary pronoun/it] also filed the lawsuit in good faith for a

reason stated in the [3/30/60]-day notice.]

New August 2007; Revised June 2010, May 2020

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
3a05020a4954d54368b7e71b7dd1ac3971a1c1bdb0a569ee2c6654aa30900604
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CACI No. 4321 — Affirmative Defense—Retaliatory Evict… · binding.law