Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 426

Negligent Hiring, Supervision, or Retention of Employee

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] was harmed by

[name of employee] and that [name of employer defendant] is responsible

for that harm because [name of employer defendant] negligently [hired/

supervised/ [or] retained] [name of employee]. To establish this claim,

[name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. [That [name of employer defendant] hired [name of employee];]

2. That [name of employee] [[was/became] [unfit [or] incompetent] to

perform the work for which [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] was hired/

[specify other particular risk]];

3. That [name of employer defendant] knew or should have known

that [name of employee] [[was/became] [unfit/ [or] incompetent]/

[other particular risk]] and that this [unfitness [or] incompetence/

[other particular risk]] created a particular risk to others;

4. That [name of employee]’s [unfitness [or] incompetence/[other

particular risk]] harmed [name of plaintiff]; and

5. That [name of employer defendant]’s negligence in [hiring/

supervising/ [or] retaining] [name of employee] was a substantial

factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.

New December 2009; Revised December 2015, June 2016

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
53cb793576a38253f3733b030cda32798379823a054a716178df85bf4430252d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.