CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 4203
Constructive Fraudulent Transfer—Insolvency—Essential
Factual Elements (Civ. Code, § 3439.05)
[Name of plaintiff] claims [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it] was harmed
because [name of debtor] [transferred property/incurred an obligation] to
[name of defendant] and was unable to pay [name of plaintiff] money that
was owed. [This is called “constructive fraud.”] To establish this claim
against [name of defendant], [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the
following:
1. That [name of plaintiff] has a right to payment from [name of
debtor] for [insert amount of claim];
2. That [name of debtor] [transferred property/incurred an
obligation] to [name of defendant];
3. That [name of debtor] did not receive a reasonably equivalent
value in exchange for the [transfer/obligation];
4. That [name of plaintiff]’s right to payment from [name of debtor]
arose before [name of debtor] [transferred property/incurred an
obligation];
5. That [name of debtor] was insolvent at that time or became
insolvent as a result of the transfer or obligation;
6. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
7. That [name of debtor]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
If you decide that [name of plaintiff] has proved all of the above, [he/she/
nonbinary pronoun/it] does not have to prove that [name of debtor]
intended to defraud creditors.
New June 2006; Revised June 2016
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
6338fa2744f5859ec64c03567dfc1ed271cde0336eb7296ca2ca0817bab494a4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.