CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 4108
Failure of Seller’s Real Estate Broker to Conduct
Reasonable Inspection—Essential Factual Elements (Civ. Code,
§ 2079)
[Name of defendant], as the real estate [broker/salesperson] for [name of
seller], must conduct a reasonably competent and diligent visual
inspection of the property offered for sale. Before the sale, [name of
defendant] must then disclose to [name of plaintiff], the buyer, all facts
that materially affect the value or desirability of the property that the
investigation revealed or should have revealed.
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it] was harmed
by [name of defendant]’s breach of this duty. To establish this claim,
[name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1. That [name of defendant] was [name of seller]’s real estate [broker/
salesperson];
2. That [name of defendant] acted on [name of seller]’s behalf for
purposes of [insert description of transaction, e.g., “selling a
residential property”];
3. That [name of defendant] failed to conduct a reasonably competent
and diligent visual inspectionof the property;
4. That before the sale, [name of defendant] failed to disclose to
[name of plaintiff] all facts that materially affected the value or
desirability of the property that such an inspection would have
revealed;
5. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
6. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New June 2013; Revised May 2020
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
2476421832f65c9f9927cffd87f23c9feb1bc0d3ba33eaba706d5bbaeecd0b2d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.