CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 4101
Failure to Use Reasonable Care—Essential Factual
Elements
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it] was harmed
by [name of defendant]’s breach of the fiduciary duty to use reasonable
care. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the
following:
1. That [name of defendant] was [name of plaintiff]’s
[agent/stockbroker/real estate agent/real estate broker/corporate
officer/partner/[insert other fiduciary relationship]];
2. That [name of defendant] acted on [name of plaintiff]’s behalf for
purposes of [insert description of transaction, e.g., “purchasing a
residential property”];
3. That [name of defendant] failed to act as a reasonably careful
[agent/stockbroker/real estate agent/real estate broker/corporate
officer/partner/[insert other fiduciary relationship]] would have
acted under the same or similar circumstances;
4. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
5. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New June 2006
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
075907ec42ff1db8406634fd2351630420c798ddcc5f13a8b89c3c0574bb8c53
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.