Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 3963

Affirmative Defense—Employee’s Duty to Mitigate Damages

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

[Name of defendant] claims that if [name of plaintiff] is entitled to any

damages, they should be reduced by the amount that [name of plaintiff]

could have earned from other employment. To succeed, [name of

defendant] must prove all of the following:

1. That employment substantially similar to [name of plaintiff]’s

former job was available to [him/her/ nonbinary pronoun];

2. That [name of plaintiff] failed to make reasonable efforts to seek

[and retain] this employment; and

3. The amount that [name of plaintiff] could have earned from this

employment.

In deciding whether the employment was substantially similar, you

should consider, among other factors, whether:

(a) The nature of the work was different from [name of plaintiff]’s

employment with [name of defendant];

(b) The new position was substantially inferior to [name of

plaintiff]’s former position;

(c) The salary, benefits, and hours of the job were similar to

[name of plaintiff]’s former job;

(d) The new position required similar skills, background, and

experience;

(e) The job responsibilities were similar; [and]

(f) The job was in the same locality; [and]

(g) [insert other relevant factor(s)].

[In deciding whether [name of plaintiff] failed to make reasonable efforts

to retain comparable employment, you should consider whether [name of

plaintiff] quit or was discharged from that employment for a reason

within [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] control.]

New September 2003; Revised February 2007, December 2014; Revised and

Renumbered from CACI No. 2407 November 2018

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
97c4caa8b05d04395082170326f1401051076bdcf8b3d1c29cd6248f4478021c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CACI No. 3963 — Affirmative Defense—Employee’s Duty t… · binding.law