CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 3942
Punitive Damages—Individual Defendant—Bifurcated Trial
(Second Phase)
Y ou must now decide the amount, if any, that you should award [name of
plaintiff] in punitive damages. The purposes of punitive damages are to
punish a wrongdoer for the conduct that harmed the plaintiff and to
discourage similar conduct in the future.
There is no fixed formula for determining the amount of punitive
damages, and you are not required to award any punitive damages. If
you decide to award punitive damages, you should consider all of the
following factors in determining the amount:
(a) How reprehensible was [name of defendant]’s conduct? In deciding
how reprehensible [name of defendant]’s conduct was, you may
consider, among other factors:
1. Whether the conduct caused physical harm;
2. Whether [name of defendant] disregarded the health or safety
of others;
3. Whether [name of plaintiff] was financially weak or vulnerable
and [name of defendant] knew [name of plaintiff] was financially
weak or vulnerable and took advantage of [him/her/ nonbinary
pronoun/it];
4. Whether [name of defendant]’s conduct involved a pattern or
practice; and
5. Whether [name of defendant] acted with trickery or deceit.
(b) Is there a reasonable relationship between the amount of punitive
damages and [name of plaintiff]’s harm [or between the amount of
punitive damages and potential harm to [name of plaintiff] that
[name of defendant] knew was likely to occur because of [his/her/
nonbinary pronoun /its] conduct]?
(c) In view of [name of defendant]’s financial condition, what amount
is necessary to punish [him/her/ nonbinary pronoun /it] and
discourage future wrongful conduct? You may not increase the
punitive award above an amount that is otherwise appropriate
merely because [name of defendant] has substantial financial
resources. [Any award you impose may not exceed [name of
defendant]’s ability to pay.]
[Punitive damages may not be used to punish [name of defendant] for the
impact of [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun/its] alleged misconduct on persons
other than [name of plaintiff].]
New September 2003; Revised April 2004, October 2004, June 2006, April 2007,
August 2007, October 2008
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
873dd3cda03e447ec2af2f2e22fc8c65a6dcd61de79bccdea02685aca9668e3c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.