CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 3400
Horizontal and Vertical Restraints (Use for Direct
Competitors)—Price Fixing—Essential Factual Elements
[Name of plaintiff] claims [name of defendant] was involved in price fixing.
Price fixing is an agreement to set, raise, lower, maintain, or stabilize the
prices or other terms of trade charged or to be charged for a product or
service, whether the prices agreed on were high or low, reasonable or
unreasonable. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of
the following:
1. That [name of defendant] [and [name(s) of alleged coparticipant(s)]]
agreed to fix [or] [set/raise/lower/maintain/stabilize] prices [or
other terms of trade] charged or to be charged for
[product/service];
2. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
3. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New September 2003
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2022
- Content hash
d187331a41691b601e602f383d83a774407903b1e033ad46bfb2a483f5dc043d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.