CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 3300
Locality Discrimination—Essential Factual Elements
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] engaged in unlawful
locality discrimination. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must
prove all of the following:
1. That [name of defendant] [offered to sell/sold/furnished] [product/
service] at a lower price in one [location/section/community/city]
in California than in another [location/section/community/city] in
California;
2. That [name of defendant] intended to destroy competition from an
established dealer [or to prevent competition from any person
who in good faith intended and attempted to become such a
dealer];
3. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
4. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New September 2003
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2023
- Content hash
e3c67d68d55a9c0b8770ceece9fdcd5c9d200fd8646703ab35b81c08e91e40c9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.