Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 3065

Sexual Harassment in Defined Relationship—Essential

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Factual Elements (Civ. Code, § 51.9)

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] sexually harassed [him/

her/nonbinary pronoun]. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must

prove all of the following:

1. [That [name of plaintiff] had a [business/service/ [or] professional]

relationship with [name of defendant];]

1. [or]

1. [That [name of defendant] held [himself/herself/ nonbinary pronoun]

out as being able to help [name of plaintiff] establish a [business/

service/ [or] professional] relationship with [[name of defendant]/

[or] [name of third party]];]

2. [That [name of defendant] made [sexual

advances/solicitations/sexual requests/demands for sexual

compliance/[insert other actionable conduct]] to [name of plaintiff];]

2. [or]

2. [That [name of defendant] engaged in [verbal/visual/physical]

conduct of a [sexual nature/hostile nature based on gender];]

3. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was unwelcome and also

pervasive or severe; and

4. That [name of plaintiff] has suffered or will suffer [economic loss

or disadvantage/personal injury/the violation of a statutory or

constitutional right] as a result of [name of defendant]’s conduct.

New September 2003; Revised April 2008; Renumbered from CACI No. 3024

December 2012; Revised January 2019

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
df0dbc94f3b1080ba07452a285073f167e9c433281d5467a34432e88fff518ea
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.