CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 3061
Discrimination in Business Dealings—Essential Factual
Elements (Civ. Code, § 51.5)
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] denied
[him/her/nonbinary pronoun] full and equal rights to conduct business
because of [name of plaintiff]’s [sex/race/color/religion/ancestry/national
origin/disability/medical condition/genetic information/marital
status/sexual orientation/citizenship/primary language/immigration
status/[any combination of those characteristics]/[insert other actionable or
protected characteristic or combination of characteristics]]. To establish this
claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1. That [name of defendant] [discriminated
against/boycotted/blacklisted/refused to buy from/refused to
contract with/refused to sell to/refused to trade with] [name of
plaintiff];
2. [That a substantial motivating reason for [name of defendant]’s
conduct was [its perception of] [name of plaintiff]’s [sex/race/color/
religion/ancestry/national origin/ disability/medical
condition/genetic information/marital status/sexual orientation/
citizenship/primary language/immigration status/[any combination
of those characteristics]/[insert other actionable or protected
characteristic or combination of characteristics]];]
2. [or]
2. [That a substantial motivating reason for [name of defendant]’s
conduct was [its perception of] the
[sex/race/color/religion/ancestry/national origin/disability/medical
condition/genetic information/marital status/sexual orientation/
citizenship/primary language/immigration status/[any combination
of those characteristics]/[insert other actionable or protected
characteristic or combination of characteristics]] of [name of
plaintiff]’s [partners/members/stockholders/directors/officers/
managers/superintendents/agents/employees/business associates/
suppliers/customers];]
2. [or]
2. [That a substantial motivating reason for [name of defendant]’s
conduct was [its perception of] the
[sex/race/color/religion/ancestry/national origin/disability/medical
condition/genetic information/marital status/sexual orientation/
citizenship/primary language/immigration status/[any combination
of those characteristics]/[insert other actionable or protected
characteristic or combination of characteristics]] of a person with
whom [name of plaintiff] was associated;]
3. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
4. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New September 2003; Revised June 2012; Renumbered from CACI No. 3021 and
Revised December 2012; Revised June 2013, December 2016, December 2025
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2026
- Content hash
4a72381a13246d0815aa901ec1140f6a803a72c02c01ca0d7505062b3f477608
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.