Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 3051

Unlawful Removal of Child From Parental Custody Without

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

a Warrant—Essential Factual Elements (42 U.S.C. § 1983)

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] wrongfully removed

[name of plaintiff]’s child from [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] parental

custody because [name of defendant] did not have a warrant. To establish

this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of defendant] removed [name of plaintiff]’s child from

[his/her/nonbinary pronoun] parental custody without a warrant;

2. That [name of defendant] was performing or purporting to

perform [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] official duties;

3. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and

4. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in

causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.

New June 2016

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
2e5cbdc8dd8de4f415f5d064be74f99e2c8c8b000328a5cf76f45f1b98b249e4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.