Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 3043

Violation of Prisoner’s Federal Civil Rights—Eighth

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Amendment—Deprivation of Necessities (42 U.S.C. § 1983)

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] subjected

[him/her/nonbinary pronoun] to prison conditions that deprived [him/her/

nonbinary pronoun] of basic rights. To establish this claim, [name of

plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of plaintiff] was imprisoned under conditions that

deprived [him/her/ nonbinary pronoun] of [describe deprivation, e.g.,

clothing];

2. That this deprivation was sufficiently serious in that it denied

[name of plaintiff] a minimal necessity of life;

3. That [name of defendant]’s conduct created a substantial risk of

serious harm to [name of plaintiff]’s health or safety;

4. That [name of defendant] knew that [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun]

conduct created a substantial risk of serious harm to [name of

plaintiff]’s health or safety;

5. That there was no reasonable justification for the deprivation;

6. That [name of defendant] was acting or purporting to act in the

performance of [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] official duties;

7. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and

8. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in

causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.

Whether the risk was obvious is a factor that you may consider in

determining whether [name of defendant] knew of the risk.

New June 2015; Revised May 2020

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
543c40f682b67fec5f8649535db0d992d06d6c95bbe5882bf651f7de72c28dab
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.