CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 3043
Violation of Prisoner’s Federal Civil Rights—Eighth
Amendment—Deprivation of Necessities (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] subjected
[him/her/nonbinary pronoun] to prison conditions that deprived [him/her/
nonbinary pronoun] of basic rights. To establish this claim, [name of
plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1. That [name of plaintiff] was imprisoned under conditions that
deprived [him/her/ nonbinary pronoun] of [describe deprivation, e.g.,
clothing];
2. That this deprivation was sufficiently serious in that it denied
[name of plaintiff] a minimal necessity of life;
3. That [name of defendant]’s conduct created a substantial risk of
serious harm to [name of plaintiff]’s health or safety;
4. That [name of defendant] knew that [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun]
conduct created a substantial risk of serious harm to [name of
plaintiff]’s health or safety;
5. That there was no reasonable justification for the deprivation;
6. That [name of defendant] was acting or purporting to act in the
performance of [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] official duties;
7. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
8. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
Whether the risk was obvious is a factor that you may consider in
determining whether [name of defendant] knew of the risk.
New June 2015; Revised May 2020
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
543c40f682b67fec5f8649535db0d992d06d6c95bbe5882bf651f7de72c28dab
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.