Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 3022

Unreasonable Search—Search With a Warrant—Essential

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Factual Elements (42 U.S.C. § 1983)

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] carried out an

unreasonable search of [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun]

[person/home/automobile/office/[insert other]]. To establish this claim,

[name of plaintiff] must prove the following:

1. That [name of defendant] searched [name of plaintiff]’s [person/

home/automobile/office/[insert other]];

2. That [name of defendant]’s search was unreasonable;

3. That [name of defendant] was acting or purporting to act in the

performance of [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] official duties;

4. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and

5. That [name of defendant]’s unreasonable search was a substantial

factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.

In deciding whether the search was unreasonable, you should consider,

among other factors, the following:

(a) The scope of the warrant;

(b) The extent of the particular intrusion;

(c) The place in which the search was conducted; [and]

(d) The manner in which the search was conducted; [and]

(e) [Insert other applicable factor].

New September 2003; Renumbered from CACI No. 3002 December 2012; Revised

November 2017

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
d9ae40b9c3d1dd73ba780d0f1dcaafcd444bf558f7e9c23b9540659971819e4e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.