CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 2810
Coemployee’s Affirmative Defense—Injury Covered by
Workers’ Compensation
[Name of defendant] claims that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] is not
responsible for any harm that [name of plaintiff] may have suffered
because [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] was [name of defendant]’s coemployee
and therefore can recover only under California’s Workers’
Compensation Act. To succeed, [name of defendant] must prove all of the
following:
1. That [name of plaintiff] and [name of defendant] were [name of
employer]’s employees;
2. That [name of employer] [had workers’ compensation insurance
[covering [name of plaintiff] at the time of injury]/was self-insured
for workers’ compensation claims [at the time of [name of
plaintiff]’s injury]]; and
3. That [name of defendant] was acting in the scope of
[his/her/nonbinary pronoun] employment at the time [name of
plaintiff] claims [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] was harmed.
New September 2003; Revised October 2004, May 2020
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
39c0f876dd61ec425a1bc3507778343926fb0b190209ecc284c8d87bd1e6cbb2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.