CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 2804
Removal or Noninstallation of Power Press
Guards—Essential Factual Elements (Lab. Code, § 4558)
A “power press” is a machine that forms materials with a die in the
manufacture of other products. A “die” is a tool that imparts shape to
material by pressing against or through the material. A “guard” is any
device that keeps a worker’s hands or other parts of the body outside
the point of operation.
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] was harmed
because [name of defendant] [removed/failed to install] guards on a power
press. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the
following:
1. That [name of defendant] was [name of plaintiff]’s
[employer/supervisor];
2. That [name of plaintiff] was injured while operating a power
press;
3. That [name of defendant] gave an affirmative instruction to
[remove/not install] the guards before [name of plaintiff]’s injury;
4. That when [name of defendant] did so, [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun /
it] knew that the lack of guards would create a probability of
serious injury or death;
5. That the power press’s [designer/fabricator/assembler] [designed
the press with guards/installed guards on the press/required
guards be attached/specified that guards be attached] and directly
or indirectly conveyed this information to [name of defendant];
and
6. That [name of defendant]’s [removal/failure to install] the guards
was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New September 2003; Revised December 2011
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
26e3f19a3322f38b68136248f65dbf569c27d5b08fa3ac81484afb10eca771a9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.