CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 2750
Failure to Reimburse Employee for Necessary Expenditures
or Losses—Essential Factual Elements (Lab. Code, § 2802(a))
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] failed to reimburse
[him/her/nonbinary pronoun] for necessary [expenditures/ [and] losses]. To
establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1. That [name of plaintiff] incurred [expenditures/ [and] losses] as a
direct consequence of [discharging [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] job
duties/obeying the directions of [name of defendant]];
2. That the [expenditures/ [and] losses] were necessary and
reasonable;
3. That [name of defendant] failed to reimburse [name of plaintiff] for
the full amount of the [expenditures/ [and] losses]; and
4. The amount of the [expenditures/ [and] losses] that [name of
defendant] failed to compensate.
[“Necessary [expenditures/ [and] losses]” may include [expenditures/
[and] losses] [name of plaintiff] would have incurred even if
[he/she/nonbinary pronoun] did not also incur them as a direct
consequence of discharging [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] job duties or
obeying the directions of [name of defendant].]
New November 2021
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
f19df2f66387090201ad0b00629f2531d857f6ddda2c78817c1ff16c5323e509
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.