CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 2743
Equal Pay Act—Retaliation—Essential Factual Elements
(Lab. Code, § 1197.5(k))
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] retaliated against [him/
her/nonbinary pronoun] for [pursuing/assisting another in the enforcement
of] [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] right to equal pay regardless of [sex/race/
ethnicity]. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the
following:
1. That [name of plaintiff] [specify acts taken by plaintiff to invoke,
enforce, or assist in the enforcement of the right to equal pay];
2. That [name of defendant] [discharged/[other adverse employment
action]] [name of plaintiff];
3. That [name of plaintiff]’s [pursuit of/assisting in the enforcement
of another’s right to] equal pay was a substantial motivating
reason for [name of defendant]’s [discharging/[other adverse
employment action]] [name of plaintiff];
4. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
5. That [name of defendant]’s retaliatory conduct was a substantial
factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New May 2018; Revised May 2020, May 2024
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
5671ab77bcae2500887189f900fb0019e20a570a92c04903f7de25e12a5c940f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.