CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 2547
Disability-Based Associational Discrimination—Essential
Factual Elements
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] wrongfully
discriminated against [him/her/ nonbinary pronoun] based on
[his/her/nonbinary pronoun] association with a person with a disability. To
establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1. That [name of defendant] was [an employer/[other covered entity]];
2. That [name of plaintiff] [was an employee of [name of defendant]/
applied to [name of defendant] for a job/[describe other covered
relationship to defendant]];
3. That [name of plaintiff] was [specify basis of association or
relationship, e.g., the brother of [name of associate]], who had [a]
[e.g., physical condition];
4. [That [name of associate]’s [e.g., physical condition] was costly to
[name of defendant] because [specify reason, e.g., [name of
associate] was covered under [plaintiff]’s employer-provided health
care plan];]
4. [or]
4. [That [name of defendant] feared [name of plaintiff]’s association
with [name of associate] because [specify, e.g., [name of associate]
has a disability with a genetic component and [name of plaintiff] may
develop the disability as well];]
4. [or]
4. [That [name of plaintiff] was somewhat inattentive at work
because [name of associate]’s [e.g., physical condition] requires
[name of plaintiff]’s attention, but not so inattentive that to
perform to [name of defendant]’s satisfaction [name of plaintiff]
would need an accommodation;]
4. [or]
4. [[Specify other basis for associational discrimination];]
5. That [name of plaintiff] was able to perform the essential job
duties;
6. [That [name of defendant] [discharged/refused to hire/[other
adverse employment action]] [name of plaintiff];]
6. [or]
6. [That [name of defendant] subjected [name of plaintiff] to an
adverse employment action;]
6. [or]
6. [That [name of plaintiff] was constructively discharged;]
7. That [name of plaintiff]’s association with [name of associate] was a
substantial motivating reason for [name of defendant]’s [decision
to [discharge/refuse to hire/[other adverse employment action]]
[name of plaintiff]/conduct];
8. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and
9. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New December 2014; Revised May 2017, May 2020, November 2023, May 2024*,
December 2025*
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2026
- Content hash
f3e0dcd5a1347bd55b2172c2e9b8591247e4d01cc3ec1b4ce8e22c8439139981
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.