Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 2508

Failure to File Timely Administrative Complaint—Plaintiff

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Alleges Continuing Violation (Gov. Code, § 12960(e))

[Name of defendant] contends that [name of plaintiff]’s lawsuit may not

proceed because [name of plaintiff] did not timely file a complaint with

the California Civil Rights Department (CRD). A complaint is timely if it

was filed within three years of the date on which [name of defendant]’s

alleged unlawful practice occurred.

[Name of plaintiff] filed a complaint with the CRD on [date]. [Name of

plaintiff] may recover for acts of alleged [specify the unlawful practice, e.g.,

harassment] that occurred before [insert date three years before the CRD

complaint was filed], only if [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] proves all of the

following:

1. That [name of defendant]’s [e.g., harassment] that occurred before

[insert date three years before the CRD complaint was filed] was

similar or related to the conduct that occurred on or after that

date;

2. That the conduct was reasonably frequent; and

3. That the conduct had not yet become permanent before that date.

“Permanent” in this context means that the conduct has stopped, [name

of plaintiff] has resigned, or [name of defendant]’s statements and actions

would make it clear to a reasonable employee that any further efforts to

resolve the issue internally would be futile.

New June 2010; Revised December 2011, June 2015, May 2019, May 2020, May

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
17a519ad1b620097b3d2f2c63f6cc8619a2bd4f92848c7bdeb753b6c910dab75
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.