CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 2508
Failure to File Timely Administrative Complaint—Plaintiff
Alleges Continuing Violation (Gov. Code, § 12960(e))
[Name of defendant] contends that [name of plaintiff]’s lawsuit may not
proceed because [name of plaintiff] did not timely file a complaint with
the California Civil Rights Department (CRD). A complaint is timely if it
was filed within three years of the date on which [name of defendant]’s
alleged unlawful practice occurred.
[Name of plaintiff] filed a complaint with the CRD on [date]. [Name of
plaintiff] may recover for acts of alleged [specify the unlawful practice, e.g.,
harassment] that occurred before [insert date three years before the CRD
complaint was filed], only if [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] proves all of the
following:
1. That [name of defendant]’s [e.g., harassment] that occurred before
[insert date three years before the CRD complaint was filed] was
similar or related to the conduct that occurred on or after that
date;
2. That the conduct was reasonably frequent; and
3. That the conduct had not yet become permanent before that date.
“Permanent” in this context means that the conduct has stopped, [name
of plaintiff] has resigned, or [name of defendant]’s statements and actions
would make it clear to a reasonable employee that any further efforts to
resolve the issue internally would be futile.
New June 2010; Revised December 2011, June 2015, May 2019, May 2020, May
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
17a519ad1b620097b3d2f2c63f6cc8619a2bd4f92848c7bdeb753b6c910dab75
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.