Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 2205

Intentional Interference With Expected

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Inheritance—Essential Factual Elements

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] intentionally interfered

with [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] expectation of receiving an inheritance

from the estate of [name of decedent]. To establish this claim, [name of

plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of plaintiff] expected to receive an inheritance from

the estate of [name of decedent];

2. That [name of defendant] knew of the expectation;

3. That [name of defendant] engaged in [specify conduct determined by

the court to be wrongful];

4. That by engaging in this conduct, [name of defendant] intended to

interfere with [name of plaintiff]’s expected inheritance;

5. That there was a reasonable certainty that [name of plaintiff]

would have received the inheritance if [name of defendant] had not

interfered;

6. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and

7. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in

causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.

[Name of plaintiff] does not have to have been named as a beneficiary in

the will or trust or have been named to receive the particular property

at issue. A reasonable certaintyof receipt is sufficient.

New June 2013

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
12cb492894fd9211df62f89fd2332f32e58b11b58b3e2be782e7b1cf6a2fe7c9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.