Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 205

Failure to Explain or Deny Evidence

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

If a party failed to explain or deny evidence against [him/her/ nonbinary

pronoun/it] when [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it] could reasonably be

expected to have done so based on what [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun/it]

knew, you may consider [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun/its] failure to explain

or deny in evaluating that evidence.

It is up to you to decide the meaning and importance of the failure to

explain or deny evidence against the party.

New September 2003; Revised December 2012

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
01728ce9794298a0728f254e16c610d763506346324d1e896b89acc0cace6c90
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.