CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 1702
Defamation per se—Essential Factual Elements (Private
Figure—Matter of Public Concern)
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] harmed
[him/her/nonbinary pronoun] by making [one or more of] the following
statement(s): [list all claimed per se defamatory statement(s)]. To establish
this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
Liability
1. That [name of defendant] made [one or more of] the statement(s)
to [a person/persons] other than [name of plaintiff];
2. That [this person/these people] reasonably understood that the
statement(s) [was/were] about [name of plaintiff];
[3. That [this person/these people] reasonably understood the
statement(s) to mean that [insert ground(s) for defamation per se,
e.g., “[name of plaintiff] had committed a crime”];]
4. That the statement(s) [was/were] false; and
5. That [name of defendant] failed to use reasonable care to
determine the truth or falsity of the statement(s).
Actual Damages
If [name of plaintiff] has proved all of the above, then [he/she/ nonbinary
pronoun] is entitled to recover [his/her/ nonbinary pronoun] actual damages
if [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] proves that [name of defendant]’s wrongful
conduct was a substantial factor in causing any of the following:
a. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s property, business, trade, profession,
or occupation;
b. Expenses [name of plaintiff] had to pay as a result of the
defamatory statements;
c. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s reputation; or
d. Shame, mortification, or hurt feelings.
Assumed Damages
If [name of plaintiff] has not proved any actual damages for harm to
reputation or shame, mortification, or hurt feelings but proves by clear
and convincing evidence that [name of defendant] knew the statement(s)
[was/were] false or that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] had serious doubts
about the truth of the statement(s), then the law assumes that [name of
plaintiff]’s reputation has been harmed and that [he/she/ nonbinary
pronoun] has suffered shame, mortification, or hurt feelings. Without
presenting evidence of damage, [name of plaintiff] is entitled to receive
compensation for this assumed harm in whatever sum you believe is
reasonable. Y ou must award at least a nominal sum, such as one dollar.
Punitive Damages
[Name of plaintiff] may also recover damages to punish [name of
defendant] if [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] proves by clear and convincing
evidence that [name of defendant] either knew the statement(s) [was/were]
false or had serious doubts about the truth of the statement(s), and that
[he/she/nonbinary pronoun] acted with malice, oppression, or fraud.
[For specific provisions, see CACI Nos. 3940–3949.]
New September 2003; Revised April 2008, October 2008, December 2009, June
2016, December 2016, January 2018
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
8638624ca5c61f9abc4f13be715c84502d7f330a951f078b1e15434e3366061b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.