Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 1573

Under the statute, constructive fraud is a particular kind of breach of fiduciary

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

duty in which the defendant has misled the plaintiff to the plaintiff’s prejudice or

detriment. Constructive fraud differs from actual fraud (see CACI Nos. 1900−1903

on different claims involving actual fraud) in that no fraudulent intent is required.

(Civ. Code, § 1573(1).) Thus, if one who is under a fiduciary duty to provide

complete and accurate information to the plaintiff fails to do so and the plaintiff is

misled to the plaintiff’s prejudice, there is a claim for constructive fraud despite the

lack of any intent to mislead or deceive.

In element 4, choose the first option if it was the defendant’s failure to disclose

information that misled the plaintiff. Choose the second option if the defendant

provided information to the plaintiff, but the plaintiff was misled because the

information was inaccurate or incomplete.

In a fiduciary relationship, there is a rebuttable presumption of reasonable reliance.

The defendant bears the burden of rebutting the presumption by proving by

substantial evidence that the plaintiff could not have reasonably relied on the

misleading information or omission. ( Edmunds v. V alley Circle Estates (1993) 16

Cal.App.4th 1290, 1301–1302 [20 Cal.Rptr.2d 701].)

There are cases that set forth the elements of constructive fraud as “(1) a fiduciary

or confidential relationship; (2) nondisclosure (breach of fiduciary duty); (3) intent

to deceive, and (4) reliance and resulting injury (causation).” (See, e.g., Younan v.

Equifax Inc. (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 498, 516 fn. 14 [169 Cal.Rptr. 478]; see also

Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 1105, 1131

[167 Cal.Rptr.3d 832].) However, these elements conflict with the statute in at least

two ways. First, the statute clearly states that no fraudulent intent (or intent to

deceive) is required. Second, the statute is not limited to nondisclosure; it extends to

information that is disclosed, but misleading.

For discussion of the statute of limitations for constructive fraud, see CACI No.

4120, Affırmative Defense—Statute of Limitations .

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2025
Content hash
dd57d1fec550f4cda29fd7ba9be0abddbcff9ed31074214365f0622b2dfa47a1
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.