Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 1204

Strict Liability—Design Defect—Risk-Benefit Test—Essential

activein force · 2020-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Factual Elements—Shifting Burden of Proof

[Name of plaintiff] claims that the [product]’s design caused harm to

[name of plaintiff]. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove

all of the following:

1. That [name of defendant] [manufactured/distributed/sold] the

[product];

2. That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and

3. That the [product]’s design was a substantial factor in causing

harm to [name of plaintiff].

If [name of plaintiff] has proved these three facts, then your decision on

this claim must be for [name of plaintiff] unless [name of defendant]

proves that the benefits of the [product]’s design outweigh the risks of the

design. In deciding whether the benefits outweigh the risks, you should

consider the following:

(a) The gravity of the potential harm resulting from the use of the

[product];

(b) The likelihood that this harm would occur;

(c) The feasibility of an alternative safer design at the time of

manufacture;

(d) The cost of an alternative design; [and]

(e) The disadvantages of an alternative design; [and]

[(f) [Other relevant factor(s)].]

New September 2003; Revised February 2007, April 2009, December 2009,

December 2010, June 2011, January 2018, May 2019, May 2020

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2020
Content hash
838a40a38ccde3a8ffd9f2b51b143713e20990e913f35353768dfa4b964f9351
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.