CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 1122
Affirmative Defense—Weather Conditions Affecting Streets
and Highways (Gov. Code, § 831)
[Name of defendant] claims it cannot be held responsible for [name of
plaintiff]’s harm because the harm was caused by [insert weather
condition, e.g., fog, wind, rain, flood, ice, or snow] affecting the use of a
public street or highway. To succeed, [name of defendant] must prove
both of the following:
1. That [insert weather condition, e.g., fog, wind, rain, flood, ice, or
snow] affecting the use of a public street or highway was the
cause of [name of plaintiff]’s harm; and
2. That a reasonably careful person using the public streets and
highways would have noticed the [insert weather condition, e.g.,
fog, wind, rain, flood, ice, or snow] and anticipated its effect on the
use of the street or highway.
New September 2003
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2022
- Content hash
167412699515e06f87b9b96a01509eb57cea82e02392fa975603508aa4b57ea6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.