Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CACI No. 1120

Failure to Provide Traffic Control Signals (Gov. Code,

activein force · 2022-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

§ 830.4)

Y ou may not find that [name of defendant]’s property was in a dangerous

condition just because it did not provide a [insert device or marking].

However, you may consider the lack of a [insert device or marking], along

with other circumstances shown by the evidence, in determining whether

[name of defendant]’s property was dangerous.

New September 2003

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
caci-2022
Content hash
4c5b06d90bbf92776d182d344e6fa91bd6d14f7271c30474511de238bddbcbcb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.