Bindinglaw

AZ · rules

Maricopa Cnty. Super. Ct. eFiling Guidelines § 2.15

Proposed Forms of Order

activein force · 2025-12-08 – presentact-effective-date

2.15 Proposed Forms of Order

A proposed form of order or judgment must be uploaded as a supporting document to a motion, which should be the Main

Document, or to a stipulation or notice. Filing parties must not combine the proposed order or judgment with a motion, stipulation,

or notice and file them as one document. If a proposed form of order is submitted as a main document, it will be lodged with the

Court along with any supporting exhibits, but only the proposed order will be filed into the case file, and only after it is signed by

the judicial officer.

Supporting exhibits must be submitted with a motion, stipulation, or notice. All proposed forms of order and judgments must be

in a form that permits it to be modified, such as .odt or .docx format or other format permitted by the court, and cannot be

password protected.

When an eFiling submission is submitted for civil case initiation, proposed forms of order or judgment must not be uploaded

as a supporting/attached document to Complaints, Certificates of Arbitration, or Affidavits. If a proposed form of order or

judgment is submitted as a supporting/attached document to one of the aforementioned Main Documents, it will not be

submitted to a judicial division and it will not be part of the court record.

Provenance

Source
www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-29
Edition
2026-09-29
Content hash
c4a0cab255c99614102519f6f2433a97c5c4a2a3cf2281e79ca41a5208abf9bf
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.