AL · rules

Ala. R. Juv. P. 15.1

Juvenile conference committees

activein force · 2011-10-01 – presentact-effective-date

(A) A juvenile court judge desiring to establish a Juvenile Conference

Committee shall appoint citizens of the county to serve as members of the

committee. A Juvenile Conference Committee shall consist of at least five, but not

more than nine, members. The term for each member shall be set by the juvenile

court judge when the judge makes the appointment, but no member's term shall

exceed three years. Committee members shall serve at the pleasure of the juvenile

court judge who appointed them or that judge's successor in office. Once

appointed, a member must complete a training program conducted or approved by

the Administrative Office of Courts. The members shall serve without

compensation. The members of a Juvenile Conference Committee shall select a

chairperson and a secretary at the first organizational meeting of the committee.

(B) All matters coming before a Juvenile Conference Committee shall be

held in strict confidence, and the members of the Juvenile Conference Committee

shall comply with all laws and rules regarding the confidentiality of proceedings

against children. Every member of a Juvenile Conference Committee shall be

sworn by the juvenile court judge to observe the confidential nature of the

committee proceedings. A committee member may, however, when authorized by

the committee as a whole and with the prior approval of the juvenile court judge,

publicize in general terms the duties of the Juvenile Conference Committee, the

kinds and number of cases it reviews (without in any way revealing the names or

identities of persons involved or the action taken in any specific case), or any

community conditions the committee's work indicates may require correction to

prevent future misconduct by children.

juvenile court intake officer, before a petition is filed, shall review all cases involving

a child charged with a status offense or an offense that would be considered a

violation or a misdemeanor if the child had been charged as an adult to determine

whether the child is eligible for referral to the Juvenile Conference Committee. If,

after his or her review, the juvenile court intake officer determines that the case is

eligible for referral to the Juvenile Conference Committee and is appropriate for

the informal-adjustment process, the procedures in Rule 15 of these Rules shall

be applied. If, after his or her review, the juvenile court intake officer determines

that a petition should be filed, the juvenile court intake officer and the prosecutor

in that county shall review the case after the petition is filed to determine whether

the child is eligible for referral to the Juvenile Conference Committee. If there is

disagreement concerning whether the case is eligible for referral to the Juvenile

Conference Committee, the juvenile court judge will make the determination. If the

case is eligible for referral to the Juvenile Conference Committee, the child may

choose to appear before the Juvenile Conference Committee or to appear in

juvenile court.

(D) If the child chooses to appear before the committee in lieu of

appearing in juvenile court, the Juvenile Conference Committee shall meet with

the child and the child’s parent or parents, legal guardian, or legal custodian at a

specified date, time, and place. Written notice of the date, time, and place of the

meeting shall be given to the child and the child's parent or parents, legal guardian,

or legal custodian. Written notice of the meeting also shall be given to the

complainant and the victim. The notice shall inform the child and the child's parent

or parents, legal guardian, or legal custodian that, in cases referred after a

petition is filed, the juvenile court judge may assess court costs and other

applicable fees upon the judge's adoption of the recommendations of the Juvenile

Conference Committee. The notice shall inform the complainant and the victim

that if he or she cannot attend the meeting, the complainant and the victim may

submit a written statement for the Juvenile Conference Committee to consider. No

one shall be compelled to appear before a Juvenile Conference Committee. If

someone who the committee believes is essential to a resolution of the matter does

not want to appear before the committee, or if the child or the child's parent or

parents, legal guardian, or legal custodian is not satisfied with the proceedings of

the committee, the Juvenile Conference Committee shall refer the matter to the

juvenile court.

(E) With the voluntary cooperation of the child, the child's parent or

parents, legal guardian, or legal custodian, and others present at the meeting, the

Juvenile Conference Committee shall attempt to determine what factors brought

the child to juvenile court and, in cases referred after a petition is filed, shall

recommend to the juvenile court judge sanctions that will attempt to help the child

develop into a productive member of society. The Juvenile Conference

Committee's primary concern is to forestall more serious misconduct by the child

offender by obtaining the voluntary cooperation of the child, the child's parent or

parents, legal guardian, or legal custodian and others involved in the case. In

cases referred after a petition is filed, the Juvenile Conference Committee shall

present its recommendations to the juvenile court judge, who may approve or

disapprove the sanctions recommended by the committee. If the juvenile court

judge approves and adopts the committee's recommendations, the Juvenile

Conference Committee shall monitor compliance with its recommendations and

advise the juvenile court judge of the child's progress. If the child is not satisfied

with, or does not accept, the committee's recommendations as approved by the

juvenile court judge, or if, at any time, the child fails to comply with those

recommendations, the matter shall be referred to the juvenile court.

(F) In cases referred after a petition is filed, the juvenile court judge, at

any time, may terminate the process and dismiss the child without further

proceedings or terminate the committee's review or monitoring and direct that the

child's case be referred to juvenile court.

History

[Added eff. 5-1-99; Amended 7-14-2011, eff. 10-1-2011.] Comment The Juvenile Conference Committees are intended to provide an alternative to formal court proceedings. It is thought that the citizen members will add a dimension of broad experience to deal with problems relating to children. The order adopting this rule and comment is published in Alabama Reporter, 727 So. 2d. Comment to Amendment to Rule 15.1 Effective October 1, 2011 Former subsection (A) was deleted as being more of a policy statement than a procedural rule. Former subsection (B) was redesignated subsection (A). Former subsection (G) was redesignated subsection (B). Subsection (C) was amended to provide that if a Juvenile Conference Committee is established in a county, the juvenile court intake officer can refer eligible cases to a Juvenile Conference Committee before a petition is filed as part of the informaladjustment process in Rule 15. If, after his or her review, the juvenile court intake officer determines that a petition should be filed, the juvenile court intake officer and the prosecutor in that county shall review the case after the petition is filed to determine whether the child is eligible for referral to the Juvenile Conference Committee. Language in the other subsections was amended to provide that, in cases that were referred to a Juvenile Conference Committee after a petition was filed, costs and fees may be assessed or sanctions imposed by a judge. Other changes to this rule were technical. Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending effective October 1, 2011, Rule 1, Rule 2, Rule 3, Rule 5, Rule 6, Rule 8, Rule 9, Rule 12, Rule 13, Rule 14, Rule 15, Rule 15.1, Rule 17, Rule 18, Rule 20, Rule 23, Rule 24, Rule 25, Rule 26, Rule 28, and Rule 31 and adopting effective October 1, 2011, Rule 8.1 and the Comment to Amendment to Rule 1 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 2 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 3 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 5 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 6 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 8 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Adoption of Rule 8.1 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 9 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 12 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 13 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 14 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 15 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 15.1 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 17 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 18 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 20 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 23 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 24 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 25 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 26 Effective October 1, 2011; the Comment to Amendment to Rule 28 Effective October 1, 2011; and the Comment to Amendment to Rule 31 Effective October 1, 2011, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from ___ So. 3d.

Provenance

Source: judicial.alabama.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-15
Edition: 2026-09-15
Content hash: 7a1ff211a2522ec44259cbaccab9fc8426b56654044eb074d6cb6c725f8178aa

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs