Ala. R. Crim. P. 13.2

History

Committee Comments This rule is designed to simplify the pleading in criminal matters, much the same as the simplification of pleading in civil actions, and it eliminates the necessity of formal averments of such things as qualifications of grand jurors. Ala.Code 1975, § 15-8-25, requires: “An indictment must state the facts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language, without prolixity or repetition, in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended and with that degree of certainty which will enable the court, on conviction, to pronounce the proper judgment. In no case are the words ‘force of arms’ or ‘contrary to the form of the statute’ necessary.” In Alabama, the rule is that “indictments are rather a statement of legal conclusion, than of facts,” and it is not required that an indictment plead evidentiary facts necessary to a conviction. Hochman v. State, 265 Ala. 1, 3, 91 So.2d 500, 501 (1956). An indictment is sufficient if it substantially follows the language of the statute violated, provided the statute prescribes with definiteness the constituents of the offense. Ex parte Allred, 393 So.2d 1030, 1032 (Ala.1981). Section (b) requires that the citation of any applicable statute, etc., be included. Since the adoption of the criminal code, this should not be an undue burden and will ensure that the defendant and his attorney will know exactly what offense is charged and thus be able to discover and take advantage of any exception, defense, or affirmative defense permitted by law. Section (b) makes it clear that lesser included offenses do not have to be cited. Section (c) provides that allegation of facts constituting an offense will encompass all lesser offenses necessarily included therein, without the necessity for so stating in the indictment or information. Lesser included offenses are found in Ala.Code 1975, § 13A-1-9(a). Section (d) is a safeguard against the longstanding common law rules of pleading with which Alabama criminal procedure has been burdened. Statements of time and place are specifically made unnecessary (unless they are a material ingredient of the offense) by Ala.Code 1975, §§ 15-8-30 and 15-8-31. The provisions of Ala.Code 1975, § 15-8-3, are superseded by this section. Section (e) provides a necessary safeguard for the defendant, in that for good cause shown the defendant can compel the state to submit additional details of the offense not required to be set out in the body of the indictment. Because of the “good cause” requirement, it is contemplated that motions for more definite statement will not be routinely made or granted. Rule 13.2, taken together with Rule 13.5(a), which provides for amendment of charges, and Rule 15.5(c) tolling the running of statutes of limitation, should work to eliminate most circumstances where the state is precluded from prosecuting a defendant due to a pleading technicality. See Ex parte Allred, 393 So.2d 1030 (Ala.1981); Hochman v. State, 265 Ala. 1, 91 So.2d 500 (1956).