AL · rules

Ala. R. Civ. P. 5.1

Privacy Protection for Court Filings

activein force · 2012-08-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Redacted Filings. Unless the court orders otherwise, in an electronic or

paper filing with the court that contains a Social Security number, a taxpayer-identification

number, or a financial-account number, a party or nonparty making the filing may include

only the last four digits of any such Social Security number, taxpayeridentification number,

or financial-account number.

(b) Exemptions from the Redaction Requirement. This redaction requirement

does not apply to the following:

(1) a financial-account number that identifies the property allegedly subject to

forfeiture in a forfeiture proceeding;

(2) information contained in the record of any administrative, agency, or court

proceeding, if that record was not subject to the redaction requirement when

originally created;

(3) a filing governed by or subject to a statute, rule, regulation, or other

provision of law that requires the inclusion of the information that would

otherwise be subject to redaction by this rule; and

(4) a filing covered by Rule 5.1(c).

seal without redaction. The court may later unseal the filing or order the person who made

the filing to file a redacted version for the public record.

(d) Party Access. Any party to a civil action is presumptively entitled upon

request to a copy of a filing made under seal pursuant to Rule 5.1(c) and to an unredacted

copy of any redacted filing made pursuant to this rule. Upon such a request, a person who

previously made such a filing shall either promptly provide to the requesting party the

requested filing under seal or an unredacted copy or file a timely motion to be excused

from providing such documents to the requesting party.

(e) Protective Orders. For good cause shown, the court may order the redaction

of additional information from any filing or may order the removal from a filing of any

information required to be redacted but not redacted from that filing.

(f) Responsibility for Privacy Protection. The attorney, party, or nonparty filing

documents in the clerk’s office or the electronic court record is responsible for making the

redactions required by this rule. Neither the clerk nor any other official custodian of court

records shall be responsible for reviewing documents filed with the court for compliance

with this rule.

(g) Waiver of Protection of Identifiers. Subject to the provisions of subsection

(e), a person or entity waives the protection of Rule 5.1(a) as to the person or entity’s own

information by filing it without redaction and not under seal.

(dc) District Court Rule. Rule 5.1 applies in the district courts.

History

[Adopted 3-26-2012, eff. 8-1-2012.] Committee Comments to August 1, 2012, Adoption of Rule 5.1 This rule is modeled on Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A significant change is the omission of the provisions in the federal rule for including only the year of an individual's birth date and only the initials of a minor. Many state-court filings require this information, and the information may affect jurisdictional matters, such as when child-support obligations expire. The risk of unauthorized and unwanted access to minors’ names and people's birthdates via electronic searching of court records does not warrant a routine redaction requirement. In cases where such redaction is needed and appropriate, a party may proceed under Rule 5.1(e). Rule 5.1(c), like Federal Rule 5.2(d), does not limit or expand the judicially developed rules that govern sealing. As with Federal Rule 5.2(e), nothing in Rule 5.1(e) is intended to affect the limitations on sealing that are otherwise applicable to the court. Rule 5.1(d) is added to make clear that redaction pursuant to Rule 5.1(a) or sealing pursuant to Rule 5.1(c) – i.e., solely for limiting inappropriate Internet access to sensitive information filed electronically or scanned into the court's electronic file – does not affect an opposing party’s right to the information. If there is reason to limit other parties' access to the information, the filing party or person may seek such relief pursuant to Rule 5.1(d). Rule 5.1(f) is similar to a comment to Federal Rule 5.2. It is included here as part of the rule to emphasize that this procedure does not impose any responsibility on court officers or personnel to review documents for redactions or to redact documents. Rule 5.1(g) is substantially identical to Federal Rule 5.2(h). Like Federal Rule 5.2(h), Rule 5.1(g) is intended to allow a party or a person the choice of declining to redact their own information, such as when the burden or expense of redaction outweighs the benefits of privacy. As with Federal Rule 5.2(h), if a person files an unredacted identifier by mistake, that person may seek relief from the court. Note from the reporter of decisions: The order adopting Rule 5.1, Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from So. 3d.

Provenance

Source: judicial.alabama.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-15
Edition: 2026-09-14
Content hash: 0ba538678b3abcbc8bfcc93ea1685ea93f0c70e3c45ea36a26ce6b7eb11a36a4

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs