AL · rules
Ala. R. App. P. 29
Briefs of an amicus curiae
(a) When permitted. A brief of an amicus curiae may be filed only by
leave of court granted on motion, or at the request of the court.
(b) Motion for leave to file. A motion for leave to file an amicus brief shall
identify the interest of the applicant and shall state the reasons why the brief of
an amicus curiae is desirable. The brief may be conditionally filed with the motion
for leave to file.
(c) Contents, Form, and Length. An amicus brief shall conform to the
provisions of Rule 28(b). The length of the amicus brief shall be limited to one-half the length allowed for the principal brief of the party whose position the
amicus brief will support, unless a motion for enlargement pursuant to Rule
28(j)(3) is approved by the court.
(d) Time for Filing. Unless otherwise allowed by the court, the brief of an
amicus curiae shall be filed within the time allowed the party whose position the
amicus brief will support.
(e) Reply brief. Except by the court’s permission, an amicus curiae may
not file a reply brief.
(f) Oral argument. An amicus curiae may participate in oral argument only
upon motion and leave of court.
History
[Amended eff. 5-7-2015; Amended 4-16-2026, eff. 6-1-2026.] Committee Comments The provision of FRAP Rule 29 permitting the filing of an amicus brief by consent of all the parties has been deleted, since it is felt that such consent would so rarely be granted as to make such a provision meaningless. The elimination of the process of consent to amicus briefs is based upon the reality that most amicus briefs are in fact a type of adversary intervention rather than objective assistance to the court. However, if the court requests an amicus brief as is allowed by the rule, it may obtain such outside objective assistance. There was no former Supreme Court Rule governing the filing of amicus briefs, but the practice has been generally in accord with this rule. Under former practice, the time for filing an amicus brief has been set by the court, which is still permitted if the court desires something other than the time fixed by the rule. The rule is derived from former Alabama practice, FRAP Rule 29 and Colorado Appellate Rule 29. Committee Comment to the Amendment of Rule 29(c) and (d) Effective June 1, 2026 Rule 29(c) has been amended to provide that the format of a brief of an amicus curiae must conform to Rule 28(b), thus allowing an amicus brief to omit the statements of jurisdiction, the case, the issues, the facts, and the standard of review. Rule 29(c) has been further amended to provide that the length of the amicus brief shall be limited to being no longer than one-half the length of the principal brief of the party whose position the amicus brief will support, unless the court enlarges the length in response to a motion. Rule 29(d) has been amended to delete the phrase "on the appeal." Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 29, effective May 7, 2015 is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from ___ So. 3d. Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 29(c) and (d), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, adopting the Committee Comment thereto, and adopting the Court Comment to Rule 34, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, effective June 1, 2026, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d.
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
91186dc1002f6be07306d58dc077bb4a9a068ed2c888bed2fa08caffc0e253a9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.