AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) SPOLIATION
Spoliation
Spoliation
There has been evidence that the State of Alabama at one time possessed
[describe evidence allegedly destroyed] . The State of Alabama contends that the
[insert State’s evidence - evidence never existed, evidence was not in its
possession, evidence was not destroyed, loss of evidence was accidental, etc.].
Spoliation is an attempt to suppress or destroy material evidence possibly
favorable to the Defendant by the State and/or an agent of the State.
You may assume th at such evidence would have been unfavorable to the State
only if you find by a preponderance of the evidence that:
1. The State of Alabama intentionally destroyed the evidence or caused the
evidence to be destroyed; (AND)
2. The State of Alabama destroyed the evidence or caused the evidence to be
destroyed in bad faith.
[Insert instruction for preponderance of the evidence.]
The fact of spoliation may be established by direct or circumstantial evidence and
proof is sufficient if from the facts and circumstances adduced, it can be reasonably
inferred. You are not required to make this inference, however, and you must consider
any rebuttal evidence that has been offered by the State. Whether you ultimately choose
to make the inference is your decision as the finder of fact.
Spoliation is sufficient to infer the Defendant’s innocence.
History
[Approved 06-17-16.]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
1a948ea4ebcd1f2e99e29da61b4f4274ffbcb6eac00f48c72f90c8ee368db2fc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.