AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) PREPONDERANCE_OF_THE_EVIDENCE
Preponderance of the Evidence
Preponderance of the Evidence
In this case it is the responsibility of the [State/Defendant] to prove every essential
part of his/her/its claim[s], [describe claim], by a “preponderance of the evidence.”
A “preponderance of the evidence” means an amount of evidence that is enough
to persuade you that the [State/Defendant]’s claim is more likely true than not true. If the
proof fails to establish any essential part of a claim or contention by a preponderanc e of
the evidence, you should find against the [State/Defendant] making that claim or
contention.
[Read as appropriate]: When more than one claim is involved, you should
consider each claim separately.
In deciding whether any fact has been proved by a preponderance of the evidence,
you may consider the testimony of all of the witnesses, regardless of who may have called
them, and all of the exhibits received in evidence, regardless of who may have produced
them.
If the proof supports every essential part of the [State/Defendant]’s claim[s] by a
preponderance of the evidence, you should find for the [State/Defendant] as to that
claim.
If the proof fails to establish any essential part of the [State/Defendant]’s claim[s]
by a preponderance of the evidence, you should find for the [Defendant/State] as to that
claim.
History
[Approved 06-17-16.]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
c75505a0b86a8cb10488fbed508ee5b2358adb19485e20e6450b2bce38f38f20
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.