AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 32-5A-190_RECKLESSDRIVING
Reckless Driving
Reckless Driving
The Defendant is charged with reckless driving.
A person commits the crime of reckless driving if he/she drives a vehicle
carelessly and heedlessly in willful or wanton disregard for the rights or safety of
persons or property, or without due caution and circumspection and at a speed
or in a manner so as to endanger or be likely to endanger any person or
property.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each one of
the following elements:
The Defendant drove a vehicle: [Read as appropriate]
(A) Carelessly and heedlessly in willful or wanton disregard for
the rights or safety of persons or property; (OR)
(B) Without due caution and circumspection and at a speed or
in a manner so as to endanger or be likely to endanger any
person or property.
A vehicle is every device in, upon, or by which any individual or property
is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway, excepting devices moved by
human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks or electric
personal assistive mobility devices. [32-1-1.1(88)]
[Read as appropriate] A bicycle, an electric bicycle, or a ridden animal is
a vehicle. [32-1-1.1(88)]
[Read as appropriate]: A willful act is an act done intentionally, knowingly,
and purposely, without justifiable excuse, as distinguished from an act done
carelessly, thoughtlessly, heedlessly, or inadvertently. [Padgett v. State, 56 So.
2d 116, 117 (Ala. App. 1952)]
[Read as appropriate]: Wantonness is conduct which is carried on with a
reckless or conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. [6–11–20(b)(3)]
A person acts recklessly with respect to a result or to a circumstance when
he/ she is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk
that the risk will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such
nature and degree that disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation from the
standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.
[13A-2-2(3)]
If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a
reasonable doubt each of the elements of reckless driving, then you shall find
the defendant guilty of reckless driving.
If you find that the State has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
one or more of the above elements of reckless driving, then you cannot find the
defendant guilty of reckless driving.
[Approved 09/26/25]
History
[Approved 09/26/25]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
3d0d7ce2eba32c8a550cb207772ad792a36ed1febdeeda2bf65b84517e49a3d8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.