Bindinglaw

AL · jury_instructions

Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-6-91.1

Aggravated Stalking Second Degree

activein force · 2015-09-02 – presentas-observed

Aggravated Stalking Second Degree

The defendant is charged with aggravated stalking in the second degree.

A person commits aggravated stalking in the second degree if he/she, acting with

an improper purpose, intentionally and repeatedly follows, harasses, telephones, or

initiates communication, verbally, electronically, or otherwise, with another person, any

member of the other person’s immediate family, or any third party with whom the other

person is acquainted, and causes material harm to the mental or emotional health of the

other per son, or causes such person to reasonably fear that his/her employment,

business, or career is threatened, and the perpetrator was previously informed to cease

that conduct, and whose conduct in doing so also violates any court order or injunction.

To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following

elements:

(1) The defendant, acting with an improper purpose, repeatedly followed,

harassed, telephoned, or initiated communication, verbally, electronically,

or otherwise, with:

(a) Another person, [Insert name];

(b) A member of the other person’s immediate family, [Insert name];

(OR)

(c) A third party with whom the other person is acquainted, [Insert

name];

(2) The defendant caused:

(a) Material harm to the mental or emotional health of the other person;

(OR)

(b) Such person to reasonably fear that his/her employment, business,

or career was threatened;

(3) The defendant was previously informed to cease that conduct;

(4) The defendant’s conduct in doing so also violated a court order or injunction;

(AND)

(5) The defendant acted intentionally.

To harass is to engage in an intentional course of conduct directed at a specified

person which alarms or annoys that person, or interferes wi th the freedom of movement

of that person, and which serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be

such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and

must actually cause substantial emotional distress. [13A-6-92(c)]

A course of conduct is a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a

period of time which evidences a continuity of purpose. [13A-6-92(a)]

A threat is any word or action, expressed or implied, made with the intent to cause

a person who is the target of the threat to fear for his/her safety or for the safety of a family

member and to cause reasonable mental anxiety, anguish or fear. [13A-6-92(b)]

A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a

statute defining an offense when his/her purpose is to cause that result or to engage in

that conduct. [13A-2-2(1)]

If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt

each of the above elements of aggravated stalking in the second degree, then you shall

find the defendant guilty of aggravated stalking in the second degree.

If you find that the State has failed to prove any one or more of the elements of the

offense of aggravated stalking in the second degree, then you cannot find the defendant

guilty of aggravated stalking in the second degree.

[If lesser-included offenses are included, the Court should instruct on those

offenses at this point.]

History

[Approved 9-2-15.]

Provenance

Source
judicial.alabama.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
93f93e0e2e8bbec52b501567d6f3cbcb2a96544d398aabbd377c6ccf323cfa06
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-6-91.1 · binding.law