AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-6-90
Stalking First Degree
Stalking First Degree
The defendant is charged with stalking in the first degree.
A person commits the crime of stalking in the first degree if he/she intentionally
and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and makes a threat, either expressed
or implied, with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily
harm.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following
elements:
(1) The defendant repeatedly followed or harassed another person, [Insert
victim’s name];
(2) The defendant made a threat, either expressed or implied;
(3) The defendant did so with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear
of death or serious bodily harm; (AND)
(4) The defendant acted intentionally.
To harass is to engage in an intentional course of conduct directed at a specified
person which alarms or annoys that person, or interferes with the freedom of movement
of that person, and which serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be
such as wou ld cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and
must actually cause substantial emotional distress. [13A-6-92(c)]
A course of conduct is a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a
period of time which evidences a continuity of purpose. [13A-6-92(a)]
A threat is any word or action, expressed or implied, made with the intent to cause
a person who is the target of the threat to fear for his/her safety or for the safety of a family
member and to cause reasonable mental anxiety, anguish or fear. [13A-6-92(b)]
A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a
statute defining an offense when his/her purpose is to cause that result or to engage in
that conduct. [13A-2-2(1)]
If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of stalking in the first degree, then you shall find the defendant
guilty of stalking in the first degree.
If you find that the State has failed to prove any one or more of the elements of the
offense of stalking in the first degree, then you cannot find the defendant guilty of stalking
in the first degree.
[If lesser-included offenses are included, the Court should instruct on those
offenses at this point.]
History
[Approved 9-2-15.]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
46dac2007bb71a90264bc8fede78907462b273c82c2f3acce6a5f51cc0408e77
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.