AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-6-152(A)(5)PRE-JULY12018
Obstruction of Enforcement of Human Trafficking First Degree Law pre-July 1, 2018
Obstruction of Enforcement of Human Trafficking First Degree Law *
[*These instructions apply to offenses committed before July 1, 2018.]
The defendant is charged with obstruction of enforcement of human trafficking in
the first degree law.
A person commits the crime of obstruction of enforcement of human trafficking in
the first degree law if he/she obstructs, or attempts to obstruct, or in any way interferes
with or prevents the enforcement of human trafficking in the first degree law.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following
elements:
1. The defendant obstructed, or attempted to obstruct, or in any way interfered
with or prevented the enforcement of human trafficking in the first degree
law, [Insert the act obstructing]; (AND)
2. The defendant acted knowingly.
As I just instructed you, one of the elements that the State must prove is that
the defendant obstructed, or attempted to obstruct, or in any way interfered with or
prevented the enforcement of human trafficking in the first degree law, [Insert the act
obstructing]. Therefore, I will now instruct you what the State must prove as to
human trafficking in the first degree.
[Read as applicable]:
A person commits the crime of human trafficking in the first degree if
he/she knowingly subjects another person to labor servitude or sexual
servitude through use of coercion or deception. [13A-6-152(a)(1)]
[OR]
A person commits the crime of human trafficking in the first degree if
he/she knowingly obtains, recruits, entices, solicits, induces, threatens,
isolates, harbors, holds, restrains, transports, provides, or maintains any
minor for the purpose of causing a minor to engage in sexual servitude.
[13A-6-152(a)(2)]
A person acts knowingly with respect to conduct or to a circumstance
described by a statute defining an offense when he is aware that his conduct is of
that nature or that the circumstance exists. [13A-2-2(2)]
If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable
doubt each of the above elements of obstruction of enforcement of human trafficking
in the first degree law, then you shall find the defendant guilty of the offense of
obstruction of enforcement of human trafficking in the first degree law.
If you find that the State has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any
one or more of the elements of obstruction of enforcement of human trafficking in the
first degree law, then you cannot find the defendant guilty of obstruction of
enforcement of human trafficking in the first degree law.
[If lesser-included offenses are included, the Court should instruct on
those offenses at this point.]
[Approved April 26, 2024].
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
7a0b17fd87049ea660347bd3e91d04f6bb179afc3e53c6515ed4ac53ea452dce
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.