AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-12-202
Criminal Solicitation to Commit Controlled Substance Crime
Criminal Solicitation To Commit Controlled Substance Crime
The defendant is charged with criminal solicitation to commit [Insert name of
controlled substance crime solicited].
A person commits the crime of criminal solicitation to commit [Insert name of
controlled substance crime solicited], if, with the intent that another person engage in
conduct constituting a crime, he/she solicits, requests, commands or importunes the other
person to engage in such conduct and the crime solicited is a controlled substance crime.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following
elements:
(1) The defendant solicited, requested, commanded or importuned a person ,
[Insert name of person solicited], to commit a controlled substance crime
[Insert name of controlled substance crime solicited];
(2) [Insert name of controlled substance crime solicited] is a controlled
substance crime; (AND)
(3) The defendant intend ed that the other person engage in conduct
constituting the controlled substance crime of [Insert name of controlled
substance crime solicited].
A person commits the crime of [Insert name of controlled substance crime
solicited] if [Insert instruction for that crime].
Importune means to urge persistently. [Instruction for 13A -4-1, Criminal
Solicitation.]
A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a
statute defining an offense, when his/her purpose is to cause that res ult or to engage in
that conduct. [13A-2-2(1)]
[Read if appropriate - Corroboration] – A person may not be convicted of
criminal solicitation on the uncorroborated testimony of [Insert name of person
solicited]. Such testimony, to be sufficient, must be corroborated by other proof of
circumstances tending to show both:
(1) the defendant solicited him/her to commit the crime of [Insert name of
controlled substance crime solicited]; (AND)
(2) the defendant did so with the requisite intent that the person be caused to
commit the crime of [Insert name of controlled substance crime
solicited]. [13A-4-1(a)]
[Read if appropriate - Renunciation] – A person is not guilty of criminal
solicitation if he/she voluntarily and completely renounced his/her criminal intent by both:
(1) notifying the person solicited of his/her renunciation; (AND)
(2) either:
(a) giving timely and adequate warning to law enforcement; (OR)
(b) making a substantial effort to prevent the criminal conduct solicited.
The burden of raising this issue is on the defendant, but this does not shift the
burden of proof to the defendant. [13A-4-1(b)]
[Read if appropriate - Incidental] – A person is not guilty of criminal solicitation
when his/her solicitation constitutes conduct of a kind that is necessarily incidental to the
commission of the offense solicited. When the solicitation constitutes an offense other
than criminal solicitation which is related to but separate from the offe nse solicited, the
defendant may be found guilty of the related offense only and not of the criminal
solicitation. [13A-4-1(c)]
[Read if appropriate - Solicited Person] – It is no defense to a prosecution for
criminal solicitation that the person solicite d could not be guilty of the offense solicited
because of any of the following:
(1) criminal irresponsibility or other legal incapacity or exemption;
(2) unawareness of the criminal nature of the conduct solicited or of the
defendant’s criminal purpose; (OR)
(3) any other factor precluding the mental state required for the commission of
the offense in question. [13A-4-1(d)]
[Read if appropriate - Incapable] – It is no defense to a prosecution for criminal
solicitation that the defendant is legally incap able of committing the solicited offense.
[13A-4-1(e)]
[Read if appropriate - Completed] – It is no defense to a prosecution for criminal
solicitation that the solicited offense was actually committed. [13A-4-5]
If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the elements of the offense, then you shall find the defendant guilty of this offense.
If you find that the State has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any one
or more of the elements of the offense, then you cannot find the defendant guilty of this
offense.
History
[Approved 6-4-18.]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
1640b2060052ff12db2ae34b62172a5f75729b1dca499fac644682710a84c56b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.