AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-11-64(1)
Altering Identification of Firearm
Altering Identification of Firearm
The defendant is charged with altering identification of a firearm.
A person commits the crime of altering identification of a firearm if he/she changes,
alters, removes, or obliterates the name of the maker, model, manufacturer's number or
other mark or identification of any firearm.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following
elements:
(1) The defendant changed, altered, removed, or obliterated the name of the
maker, model, manufacturer's number or other mark or identification of a
firearm, {insert description of firearm]; (AND)
(2) The defendant acted intentionally.
A firearm is a weapon from which a shot is discharged by gunpowder. [13A-11-
62(1); 13A-8-1(5)]
A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a
statute defining an offense, when his/her purpose is to cause that result or to engage in
that conduct. [13A-2-2(1)]
If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of altering identification of a firearm, then you shall find the
defendant guilty of altering identification of a firearm.
If you find that the State has failed to prove any one or more of the elements of
altering identification of a firearm, then you cannot find the defendant guilty of altering
identification of a firearm.
History
[Approved 05/09/19]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
104badbaa8f37144815406d4ee79d9bce7881866bf4f8d8d916c75d0eaaf7f53
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.