Bindinglaw

AL · jury_instructions

Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-11-33

Installing Eavesdropping Device

activein force · 2016-06-17 – presentas-observed

Installing Eavesdropping Device

The defendant is charged with installing an eavesdropping device.

A person commits the crime of installing an eavesdropping device if he/she

intentionally installs or places a device in a private place with knowledge it is to be used

for eavesdropping and without permission of the owner and any lessee or tenant or guest

for hire of the private place.

To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following

elements:

(1) The defendant installed or placed a device, [describe device], in a private

place, [describe];

(2) The defendant did so with knowledge it was to be used for eavesdropping;

(3) The defendant did so without permission of the owner, and any lessee or

tenant or guest for hire of the private place; (AND)

(4) The defendant did so intentionally.

A private place is a place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from casual

or hostile intrusion or surveillance, but such term does not include a place to which the

public or a substantial group of the public has access. [13A–11–30(2)]

Eavesdrop is to ov erhear, record, amplify or transmit any part of the private

communication of others without the consent of at least one of the persons engaged in

the communication, except as otherwise provided by law. [13A–11–30(1)]

Installing an eavesdropping device in a private place is prima facie evidence of

knowledge that the device is to be used for eavesdropping. [13A-11-33(b)]

A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a

statute defining an offense when his/her purpose is to cause that result or to engage in

that conduct. [13A-2-2(1)]

If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt

each of the above elements of installing an eavesdropping device, then you shall find the

defendant guilty of installing an eavesdropping device.

If you find that the State has failed to prove any one or more of the elements of

installing an eavesdropping device, then you cannot find the defendant guilty of installing

an eavesdropping device.

[If lesser-included offenses are included, the Court should instruct on those

offenses at this point.]

History

[Approved 06-17-16.]

Provenance

Source
judicial.alabama.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
c07a3cdfd8dd4b5e57a248edbcd8414cb3e8318a83f1f4280f085a9a43cc5b31
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-11-33 · binding.law