AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-11-31
Criminal Eavesdropping
Criminal Eavesdropping
The defendant is charged with criminal eavesdropping.
A person commits the crime of criminal eavesdropping if he/she intentionally uses
any device to eavesdrop, whether or not he/she is present at the time.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following
elements:
(1) The defendant used a device to eavesdrop, [describe device], whether or
not he/she was present at the time; (AND)
(2) The defendant did so intentionally.
Eavesdrop is to overhear, record, amplify or transmit any part of the private
communication of others without the consent of at least one of the persons engaged in
the communication, except as otherwise provided by law. [13A–11–30(1)]
A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a
statute defining an offense when hi s/her purpose is to cause that result or to engage in
that conduct. [13A-2-2(1)]
If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of criminal eavesdropping, then you shall find the defendant
guilty of criminal eavesdropping.
If you find that the State has failed to prove any one or more of the elements of
criminal eavesdropping, then you cannot find the defendant guilty of criminal
eavesdropping.
[If lesser-included offenses are included, the Court should instruct on those
offenses at this point.]
History
[Approved 06-17-16.]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
abea7e4aa31971596006e981a0f94a5ab4aae49d3d5ce41a57f2297e91d6cb43
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.