AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-11-241(B)
Cruelty to Dog or Cat in the Second Degree
Cruelty to Dog or Cat in the Second Degree
The defendant is charged with cruelty to a dog or cat in the second degree.
A person commits the crime of cruelty to a dog or cat in the second degree if
he/she, in a cruel manner, overloads, overdrives, deprives of necessary sustenance or
shelter, unnecessarily or cruelly beats, injures, mutilates, or causes the same to be done
a dog or a cat.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following
elements:
(1) The defendant: [Read as appropriate]:
(a) Overloaded;
(b) Overdrove;
(c) Deprived of necessary sustenance or shelter; (OR)
(d) Unnecessarily or cruelly beat, injured, mutilated;
A dog or a cat; or caused the same to be done;
(2) The defendant did so in a cruel manner; (AND)
(3) The Defendant acted [insert appropriate mens rea element - See Use
Notes].
The words dog or cat shall mean any domesticated member of the dog or cat
family. [13A-11-240(c)]
Cruel means every act, omission, or neglect, including abandonment, where
unnecessary or unjustifiable pain or suffering, including abandonment, is caused or where
unnecessary pain or suffering is allowed to continue. [13A-11-240(b)]
[Read as appropriate]: The Defendant cannot be convicted if he/she is one of the
following persons or institutions: [Read as appropriate]:
1. Academic and research enterprises that use dogs or cats for medical or
pharmaceutical research or testing;
2. Any owner of a dog or cat who euthanizes the dog or cat for humane purposes;
3. Any person who kills a dog or cat found outside of the owned or rented property
of the owner or custodian of the dog or cat when the dog or cat threatens
immediate physical injury or is causing physical injury to any person, animal,
bird, or silvicultural or agricultural industry;
4. A person who shoots a dog or cat with a BB gun not capable of inflicting serious
injury when the dog or cat is defecating or urinating on the person’s property;
(OR)
5. A person who uses a training device, anti-bark collar, or an invisible fence on
his/her own dog or cat or with permission of the owner.[13A-11-246]
If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the elements of cruelty to a dog or cat in the second degree, then you shall find
the defendant guilty of cruelty to a dog or cat in the second degree.
If you find that the State has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any one
or more of the elements of cruelty to a dog or cat in the second degree, then you cannot
find the defendant guilty of cruelty to a dog or cat in the second degree.
[If lesser-included offenses are included, the Court should instruct on those
offenses at this point.]
History
[Approved 05/09/19]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
019d739077f1102b6fd3d39a915c7c737d00f0d7627cc2898d3c2ab8bbfa516b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.