AL · jury_instructions
Ala. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13A-11-241(A) (SELL OR BUY FUR)
Cruelty to Dog or Cat in the First Degree (Offers for Sale or to Buy Fur)
Cruelty to Dog or Cat in the First Degree
(Offers for Sale or to Buy Fur)
The defendant is charged with cruelty to a dog or cat in the first degree.
A person commits the crime of cruelty to a dog or cat in the first degree if he/she
intentionally offers for sale or exchange or offers to buy or exchange the fur, hide, or pelt
of a domestic dog or cat.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following
elements:
(1) The defendant offered for sale or exchange or offered to buy or exchange the
fur, hide, or pelt of a domestic dog or cat; (AND)
(2) The defendant acted intentionally.
The words dog or cat shall mean any domesticated member of the dog or cat
family. [13A-11-240(c)]
[Read as appropriate]: The Defendant cannot be convicted if he/she is one of the
following persons or institutions: [Read as appropriate]:
1. Academic and research enterprises that use dogs or cats for medical or
pharmaceutical research or testing;
2. Any owner of a dog or cat who euthanizes the dog or cat for humane purposes;
3. Any person who kills a dog or cat found outside of the owned or rented property
of the owner or custodian of the dog or cat when the dog or cat threatens
immediate physical injury or is causing physical injury to any person, animal,
bird, or silvicultural or agricultural industry;
4. A person who shoots a dog or cat with a BB gun not capable of inflicting serious
injury when the dog or cat is defecating or urinating on the person’s property;
(OR)
5. A person who uses a training device, anti-bark collar, or an invisible fence on
his/her own dog or cat or with permission of the owner.[13A-11-246]
A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a
statute defining an offense, when his/her purpose is to cause that result or to engage in
that conduct. [13A-2-2(1)]
If you find from the evidence that the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the elements of cruelty to a dog or cat in the first degree, then you shall find the
defendant guilty of cruelty to a dog or cat in the first degree.
If you find that the State has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any one
or more of the elements of cruelty to a dog or cat in the first degree, then you cannot find
the defendant guilty of cruelty to a dog or cat in the first degree.
[If lesser-included offenses are included, the Court should instruct on those
offenses at this point.]
[Approved 05/09/19]
History
[Approved 05/09/19]
Provenance
- Source
- judicial.alabama.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
a4759752c6036d5ccccbc5cc0f83146d29481c64a48d5a6d0da8512121ef544d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.